5. Confidence interval (CI):
Even studies that are perfectly designed and carried out may show variable results because of the play of chance. CI covers the likely range of the true effect. ...
This information has been extracted from the Cochrane Collaboration website. To see the complete document:
Tools available for your use (linked within this electronic book):
Level I | Evidence from a systematic review of meta-analysis of all relevant RCTs | |
Level II | Evidence obtained from well-designed RCTs | |
Level III | Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization | |
Level IV | Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort studies | |
Level V | Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies | |
Level VI | Evidence from single descriptive or qualitative studies | |
Level VII | Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert communities |
Table taken from Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice, 2011, page 12. Print volume, 4th floor, Call # WY 100.7 M527e 211
Hierarchies of evidence from the CEBM. The three documents linked here should be used together to provide a better understanding:
Appraisal tools for Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Trials, Cohort Studies, Case Control Studies, etc.
Reference Librarians are available Monday-Friday, 8am - 5pm
Call: 409-772-2372
Text: 409-433-9976
Email
(askus [at] utmb [dot] libanswers [dot] com)
Schedule an Appointment